Is this an accurate observation of Russia and Russians?

Question

Is this an accurate observation of Russia and Russians?

Cummings moved to Russia and lived there until 1997. He shared a flat with the later Brexit-supporting economist Liam Halligan. He worked for a group attempting to set up an airline connecting Samara in southern Russia to Vienna in Austria which George Parker of the Financial Times said was "spectacularly unsuccessful". Cummings departed Russia in 1997 and reflects very poorly on the country and his time there, calling Russia a "primordially abnormal country" and an "intrinsic mafia society," whose people differ from westerners "more than the Chinese or Japanese" on a "subatomic level... to the point of being diametric opposites on everything."

90 years of brave and enlightening communism btw

Imagine if someone put the worst 1% of Poles, Jews, Gypsies, Turks and Mongolians in a blender. That's Russians.

Though he claimed publicly in January 1988 that he did not regret his decisions and that he missed nothing about England except some friends, Colman's mustard and Lea & Perrins Worcestershire sauce, his wife Rufina Ivanovna Pukhova later described Philby as "disappointed in many ways" by what he found in Moscow. "He saw people suffering too much", but he consoled himself by arguing that "the ideals were right but the way they were carried out was wrong. The fault lay with the people in charge." Pukhova said, "he was struck by disappointment, brought to tears. He said, 'Why do old people live so badly here? After all, they won the war.'" Philby's drinking and depression continued; according to Rufina, he had attempted suicide by slashing his wrists sometime in the 1960s.

What did he expect in the 90s? It was literal post-apocalypse.

Do you guys have that latinx tradcath warrior version? I can't find it in archive.

yeah but he wasn't dealing with low-class bydlos, he was dealing with airline people. And they robbed him blind.

low-class bydlos

that's every single russian

There were no "airline people". The society has collapsed. Every institution, every organisation collapsed. Most of the large production was scrapped out and sold in particles by bandits and mafia.
It was POST-APOCALYPSE. And you say "yeah, but..." Don't you know what post-apocalypse is?
American education...

Imagine if someone put the worst 1% of Poles, Jews, Gypsies, Turks and Mongolians in a blender.

How is Russia different today? The same people are in charge. Putler's mafia from the 90s.

It's much more organised with less anarchy. Also many of that old mafia was consumed or destroyed by the mafia which took the government. So everything being in more order and more organised allowed to progress bit by bit and government has total monopoly by now, no random thugs or bandits etc.

calling Russia a "primordially abnormal country"

This part is 100% true. I've lived here my whole life but I still sometimes struggle to believe that this place actually exists. It defies logic like a staircase that leads nowhere or a door that you open only to find a wall

russian culture is explained perfectly in this video

youtube.com/watch?v=kF9KretXqJw

His comment about Russia being an "Intrinsic Mafia State" is correct and your disagreement is about how the mafia became more efficient.

You could argue all countries have a mafia culture to some extent, with the only exception being Protestant/Germanic ones.

By that logic every country is mafia states, especially monarchies like the UK.
The royal family are all killers or descendants of killers.

i like russia solely because they make eurosissies seethe so badly they bleed from their asses

german mafia running baltic states, finland and russia doesnt count saar

Ah yes, the notorious German mafia.

anglo thinks everyone else is inferior

proceeds to do some of the stupidest shit possible like an airline connection from Samara (poor shithole) to Vienna out of sheer ignorance

predictably fails

proceeds to seethe

???

PROFIT?

Why are they like that?

Why include the Spotify logo?

Mafia refers to organised crime networks. The King of England isn't part of a mafia. Russia's ruling elite traces back to criminal networks that evolved in the Soviet prison system and intelligence agencies.

The King of England traces back to a bunch or we wuz vikangz who conquered England. Not that different functionally speaking.

The King isn't part of a mafia network and you're using the word mafia so loosely it becomes meaningless.

Bill Burr is anti MAGA, other than that very accurate

mafia: an organized crime syndicate that works via force and extortion

medieval vikangz: an organized crime syndicate that works via force and extortion

What relationship does Charles have to medieval vikings today? 0. What relationship does Putin have with organised crime today? 100

Ehm? A direct genetic one? You know, the source of his legitimacy by the very institution of monarchy? Are you acting dumb on purpose, lad?

So no actual real relationship to any viking plundering system that exists today?

real relationship

The only real relationship in monarchies is the genetic one, you stupid fucking wanker. You could be the beacon of morality and virtue for all I care, you have no legitimacy as a king because you have no genetic connection to the previous one.

Ehm? A direct genetic one?

He doesn't.
Kings of Medieval England were Norman and French. The sausage finger retard in 2025 is of your kind from #2737839 poopenfarten state in >>>HRE.

The Hannover line was related to the Stuarts via marriage, and the Stuarts were related to the Tudors via marriage and so on. I am well aware that no direct patrilineal link exists.

You can remove my flag though

To summarise your argument, King Charles is part of a mafia because 1000 years ago his ancestors may have been viking plunderers and this is the same as the Kremlin quite literally being ruled by organised crime groups?

Ruspigs get treated like this when fighting wars and they love it, why ask for their opinion on what proper leadership is

may have been

may

Yes, it’s the same. Stop romanticizing muh royal family. Every monarchy today traces its roots to a bunch of nigs with clubs going around the countryside and extorting the peasantry in a protection racket. You can drink as much tea in your fancy room in the Buckingham palace all you want. It doesn’t change that simple fact.

go back to pidoruzia Denis

It's the same if you're an ESL, perhaps.

Apparently understanding the institution of monarchy depends on the language you speak. Anglos really are retarded.

Imagine if someone put the worst 1% of Poles, Jews, Gypsies, Turks and Mongolians in a blender

The institution of monarchy today in form and function has no relationship in form and function to when it was founded. Moreover, the monarchy established laws and rules, while mafia states like Russia do not follow laws or rules.

1990s

wests's fault

dude it’s totally different from the days of yore

yeah the entire source of their legitimacy is the genetic connection to their ancestors of yore

Cunts like you are quasi-liberals who just worship muh royal family because da British pride o algo. Mental. Absolutely mental.

After all, they won the war

Our monarchs use their form and function to nonce children and steal money from the public though

Done legally

Everything is the same if you just claim it is and don't care about what words actually mean.

Russia is like the no 1 source of all child porn and kids being sold to pedos

No that's the latinx

Now they're the no 1 source of sending 18 year olds to their death

weird how you didn't mention a certain neighbouring country where that kind of thing is more prevalent, maybe that has something to do with why you made this thread?

Russia started the war

VPNs off, Ivan

Everything is the different if you just claim it is and don't care about what words actually mean.

I don’t understand how this devolved into semantics. Heidegger was right about the anglos. Completely incapable of deep thought because your Frankenstein language is a barrier between what you say and what you think.

Vpn off, Hivan

You do know charles could literally kill you on the spot and he won't be charged because according to britshit constitution, the King is not a legally liable or prosecutable person.
This reads especially funny after that sharia raid with horse policemen protecting muslims from the brits.