I think it's very important to remark that us new worlders descend from Evropeans, not from EU-ropeans...

Based pic and I would like to kill all the retarded niggers who confuse Europe with EU but you're brown though.

Nazus were losers who killed themselves or begged for forgiveness

The one on the left depicts things that are modern though.
Fascism is not traditional
Eurocentrism is not traditional
Nationalism is not traditional
NatSoc is not traditional
Colonialism is not traditional

but you are thirdie and i'm firstie

traditionalism and the imperium is perennial dumbass

nationalism, national socialism, and fascism are all just avatars of tribalism
Eurocentrism is extremely traditional as people in their most tribal states considered themselves to be at the center of history

95th anti EU thread today... Hmmmm

The HRE was an empire of different nations, the Roman Empire was an empire of different nations including non European ones, the Austrian empire had many different nations.
Nationalism is modern post-French Revolution liberal slop.
Socialism is even more modern.
Fascism and Nat Soc are the culmination of both liberal nationalism and socialist collectivism.
None of that is traditional.

Nationalism was a result of the sun king centralizing the french government tho

Even if you argued that, the absolutist Bourbon mindset was influenced by the enlightenment and wasn't traditional.

brown bolivian shitskin believes traditional means "old thing"

European values are about containing you Timmie barbarians beyond the Hadrian walls.

segregatoion

Making typos in a fucking meme unironically has its own place in hell. You had all the time in the fucking world to revise and correct this shit before publishing it.

Canada is a pajeet flag.

If you don't support my post-modern ideological larp you must be le brown

True
It's so funny seeing soycuck-EU-redditors trying to LARP as colonizers when their smol dicked ancestors were too afraid to move to the New World

Traditionalism is fucking retarded regardless, it's stagnation. The ideology of the future, ironically, should be something akin to archeofuturism. Any dominant culture is always dynamic, renewing itself, youthful, innovative and open, yet even in that there's place for keeping ones own roots, it's about balance, which is what irks the autists the most which tend to spiral into the ultimate logical conclusion on any principle, misunderstanding the wisdom of moderation.

without eu-ropean values europe would destroy itself just like in ww2. actually it would destroy itself worse because of the nukes

Trans rights are good.

exactly
chuds only keep drumming for more wars

Better to see Europe become a nuclear wasteland than see it in the hands of third world migrants.

Wow an actual good post

based picture

It's still better than having your daughter raped by a gang of Pakistanis in the city where your family has lived for centuries, and being thrown in jail by the state police because you called them "fucking Pakis. Though.

Me on the right walking around my walkable city to my nearest BBC provider as I blast Jefre Cantu Ledesma and eat a kebab while I salute everyone at the local pride parade

Sure but niggers and others browns are still ugly and smelly and I don't want to live near them.

That could be argued.
I think living traditions are not fossils that must be held up without a second thought.
But I hate when people present things like nationalism and fascism as traditionalist when they are clearly revolutionary in nature. Especially with Fascism, which is very clearly anti-reactionary and not traditional.

third world immigrants will be the first world citizens after 100 years because of the assimilation. daily europeans were burning people alive couple of hundred years ago just because someone said earth was round

negros didn't assimilate in usa tho

because of the slavery system and systematic racism until 2000's. they need another 100-200 years.

The HRE was an empire of different nations

rabble completely unrelated to the point, imperialism refers to the absolute dominion of a group over other, imperial (form imperation) boils down to the domination of others and their disposition within your dialectical structure
it has nothing to do with the content but with the dialectical relation that is as old as language is.

notice also how you already recognize the existence of nations in the era predating romantic nationalism
because while our current understanding of nation vulgary entails some attachment to land and state it was always relatively clear a nation is a group of people united by filial relations of collective identity, normally grounded in blood and idiosincracy, often also attached to the land they subsist from but less so compared to blood, people exists with and without domains.

socialism is already observable in the biblical eras, and its very clearly something practiced by older kinship based cultures; kingship and the role of lordship ultimately came from a tribal affiliation and a capacity to fullfil certain roles, tribal affiliation also led to the posession of domains where people of the same clans, tribes, gens, etc. would live and mantain their own, a mutualist and socialist approach WITHIN one's own extended family, namely clan, tribe or nation was always there, the notion of familiar and tribal obligations is so old that the very religion of the west is about a tribal king incarnating a god after his tribe went perverted and began neglecting their familiar and tribal obligations such as feeding their poor, caressing their ancestors, honouring their temples, etc

these are extremely traditional ideologies that simply got reformulated to a modern language, they were "rediscovered", but were as old as mankind is
fascism is just the "fraternity" of the french revolution, where communism is "equalty" and liberalism is "liberty"

No one cares about you being rich bro thats not the point.
You are making a technocratic or utilitarian argumen

is was never about keeping the living conditions regardless of for who

None of this has ever happened to me

It's not about you retarded paki.

i don't understand traditionalism therefore i think it's just "return to monke o algo"

do you know the core of Western tradition is the myth of the sol invictus right?
it's a myth of rebirth
the "old father" tries to devour "the son" to not be succeded, and the sun rise again from death

the sun is both in the past and in the future, it preserves the past and also leans towards the future

in tradition you also recognize the most basal figures of reality like the cosmic whore, kali, which is accelerationism and equalty.
feminity undiluted. the future is uniformity, the world tends towards entropy, entropy is equalty, over time, boundaries tend to break, to mantain those boundaries is to live

putting effort into 4channing

colonialism

globalism

its the same thing

expanding yourself onto others is the same as letting others expand over you

What is it that you don't understand? I don't care about "integration", is the Pakistani mayor of London "integrated"? We don't care if you or your grandparents were already born here, we don't care if it causes turmoil, economic collapse, outright poverty and famine, wars, mass casualty events, we don't care anymore, all of you are going back and we are coming with a vengeance.

Evolian gibberish is nice on paper, but in real life traditionalism is just some shithole like Afghanistan.

traditionalism is a set of practices and beliefs that will mantain the integrity of your shape over time, what is life?
is to mantain energy in space across time on certain form and pattern, it's a rythim.
how do you mantain life? by keeping the boundariest that mantain that pattern, and replicating it.
how do you keep boundaries? by applying pressure, without pressure, things will reach more efficiency to replicate further, uand to channel more efficiency, they will begin dissolving boundaries and taking boundless forms, often irrecognizable and alien to what they were
if you become a technocrat you will doubtlessly lose your form to channel the full potential of technology, in the end, you will be no more human, just like a whore will create many children, none like her

afghans are just muslim pajeets, that's not what we mean when we discuss traditionalism
traditionalism has nothing to do with technological stagnation, it's perennial
its a type of language and education, and it's ultimately conjuring the eternal empire to supress whoredom, it's also the recognition of the symbols primeval to existence
such as the old gods

you'll do nothing diego

Why is it always an North/Sough American flag? Why are new worlders so fucking obsessed with Europe and "muh decline of the west"?

She passes as a Morrocan

Insane how I saw none of this stuff when I visited the UK, it looked and felt like a very normal country the entire time - Brits think police state behavior is banning disgusting behavior like indoor smoking, so I no longer take y'all seriously

never have i ever seen a more accurate picture EVROPA mogs

Because they know.
Im french cependant.

Left has nothing to do with the European (Greek) culture

Imperium means the quality that gives one the ability to command and have dominion.
The one who becomes imperator is an individual, perhaps a family, but not really a nation. And Rome particularly was quite permeable to influences foreing to Rome like the philosophies from Greece, and religions like Isis cult, Mithraism and Christianity.
Nationalism, the idea that there must be a nation state that represents one's nation is a modern development. And it runs contrary to empires. In fact old empires like the Habsburgian one had a very antagonistic relationship towards nationalism for obvious reasons.
The industrial nature of the social order in Fascist regimes and their understanding of society, as almost a hivemind, is not reflected in traditional thought.
What you describe as "biblical eras" socialism is just a healthy society with filial bonds and mutal help. Duties and privileges.
Ancient and Medieval Europe had a complex societal tapestry of guilds, temples, nobles, and merchants who made up society snd this was destroyed by the XIX and XX centuries' revolutions that gave rise to the ideologies, just secularised religions to justify the power grab, that you sre describing in your post.
If you want to play a game of words and try to redefine things to say black is white then do so, but be clear with it and stop misleading people. Especially when nationalism often involved the uprooting of local cultures, like what happened to the non-French populations in France like the Occitans or the Bretons, to replace them with a rationalist positivist secular mindset which is probably the opposite from what people see as traditionalist.