Increrasingly poor

Brazil is 30% white, their major cities are filled with slums, is one the world capitals of violence and they barely have any muslims
there is no country in such situation here

zigga/10 psychoanalysis

Are you writing from your world of selective memories where Brexit didn't happen

I write from the selective memory of France and germany elections getting swung by a new 10% of the population that acts like a voting block

This is true for all the western world since 2008.

big difference; the EU is actively trying to impose a vassal state condition; paid shills like this one literally had a spergout when USAID cut down the jewishbuxx.
it forces each member state to open up their economy and nuke their industries and local currency to operate within european integrated markets, which themselves require of a broader international market and pressures member states to bend over international diplomacy to cater to them

it is no surprise Germany turned into a dumping ground for the shitskins of the world

Brazil has good fruits and fauna after all
In Europe it will be mostly muzzies lmao

literally shut up bro you are some churka armenian from north iraq lol no shit you support this niggerhell
brazil used to be 70% white until it wasnt, same happened to california, texas, new york, etc
and the same is quickly happening in the EU and its orbiter states,
last time i went germanyit looked like syria

Brazil is 50% brown, 40% white (kind of), 10% negro, isn’t it?

France or Germany might legit look like that in 30 years, no meme.

To begin with, stop answering the goatfucker
It's obvious he can't come up with cohesive sentences

same happened to california, texas, new york, etc

Should tell you it doesn’t have anything to do with a European organization

north Iraq

strange place to bring up
are you kurdish or iranian ?

economy has been in a recession for a decade

average growth was ~1.5% in the eurozone 2010 to 2020

????

it has everything to do because the people running the EU is receiving bribes, allowing lobbies, and trying to emulate the political system of california and that imposed by liberals in america
USAID funds dont come from the couch, Ukraine war is being funded by coastal american gibs

atlanticism boils down to a common project between american liberals and Europe, that common project is, incidentially, one of globalist, egalitarian and technocratic character that must get rid of "dangers to democracy"democracy understood as a global
to attain it, nations must be dissolved

Nigga population replacement is happening in nations completely unaffiliated with the USA

try not being like 50km north of iraq i guess?
people happens to be like those living within similar geographic boundaries

good afternoon Dmitri

France and germany elections getting swung by a new 10% of the population that acts like a voting block

Literal schizo ideations, get an actual argument.

France and germany elections getting swung by a new 10% of the population

Ah yes, France, where the EU forced them to take in refugees after forcing them to join the EU

fuck off with your mental illness, Jensen

A 1.5% annual growth rate post 2008 is a complete disaster.

Nigga population replacement is happening in nations completely unaffiliated with the USA

and the USA is funding it in Europe, and the EU is making sure to keep all the surveillance, sanctions and regulations to enforce it

The annual average 2010 to 2019 was around 2.6%, 2020 adds a -7% to the average because of the pandemic

Literal schizo ideations

so are you telling me you import a voting block with 5 kids per woman fertility, a very strong minority tribal identity and foreign interests and they just... wont vote?
lets get ovbedr the "its not happening" to the "its a good thing" stage no?
EU says it everytime, we are in a multicultural society

Thats why it ended in Britain the second it left amirite

britain its part of the anglosphere, all anglosphere countries are under the US authority.
be it canada or australia
Uk or new zealand
France leadership and EU leaderships don't differ
both are post ww2 american occupier projects

saaar you have to support brazilificaiton or you are le scary russian,when a churka shitskin is speaking listen and learn

vpn off ranjeet

This nigga denying eu economynis big japan kek

I gotta wonder how you keep up with china without pimping the continent

We were never actually white. Our history is very different from California's

But yes it is a good thing.

Islam will save Europa from the claws of NATO, liberal democracy and capitalism

Even you: talk about muh economy, muh recession
You're just another GDP worshipping parasite. Go get a real job, you parasite
Europa does need "people" like you. LAzy, worthless, parasitic, refuse to work actual real jobs.

Brazil with snow

since when we have a bunch of mohammedans here?

To add to that: we received European immigrants but at no point they outnumbered the locals. This narrative that Brazil used to be white is very strange to me, we're just a regular Latin American country, we've got less immigrants than Argentina as percentage of the total population. If you want to talk about becoming poor or racemixed there's no reason to pick our country in particular in a sea of countries just like that

we're all mixed, France ain't mixed outside of like 3 mulattos, people in europe are segregated

source?

vpn off hivan

This is bullshit though

Brazil was of predominantly european descent in the mid 60's.
Pardos were less. Favellas were forbidden and broken down so they didnt had were to reproduce
European migrants had higher fertility and browns in general were more srttled in the north sparsely as opposed to the dense settlement in the south

We are still of predominantly european descent. Stop mixing Brazilian history with Argentinean. European immigrants didn't outnumber the population of colonial stock not even in the south

favelas were never "forbidden" wtf are you talking about, Brazil is still predominantly european to this day, it's just that we're also mixed with natives, africans and to a less extent asians

We have more pardos now because of changing in self identification. People who used to self identify as white are now calling themselves pardos. Also settlement has been very dense outside of the south. Also like other guy said favelas were never forbidden. Everything you say is inaccurate

I'm not mixing brazilians with argentinians
I know brazil government and i know they act exactly like they do here.
And that your browns (you) like to pretend it was always the niggerhell lula turned it onto like browns here deny argentina ever had a different majority and now they do the same on california and texas.
Rewriting history is part of the program. "Britain was built by diversity, there has always been blacks on the uk"
Same agenda, different subject
Brazil was historically a moderately segregated country with the majority of its population being descended from italian, german or poruguese migrants agglomerated in the urban-industrial centers of the south
With the pardo-afrotransatlantic slave workers remained predominantly in the north.
It was internal migration, derracination government policy creating a new national identity and rewriting it to make it look like it was always favella funkland

I know it when i see it because they did the same here,
The migrants 100% outnumbered your colonial population which was anyway diatributed unevenly.

They were cracked down retard
You dont need to tipify something in law to make it happen.
Favellas began forming with the industrial developement of brazil and their consolidation was slow and arround the 80s onwards

Also when i mean segregated i mean regionally segregated (north south divide).
Obviously not legally or socially

it was always a pardo country, the 50s rio pic you saw on twitter doesn't change that, you see footage from the common people in the 40s and most of them were brown just like today, what's incorrect is thinking we're all black, which is not true, but we were never a pearly white country, even the whitest regions had natives and african ex-slaves who ended up mixing with the euro immigrants, just not to the same extent

Socially there was a lot of segregation too, though.

I'm not mixing brazilians with argentinians

I know brazil government and i know they act exactly like they do here.

I've had far too many interactions with your flag to know that you are always talking about us using the lens of your own particular social and historical contexts.

The rest of your post is too idiotic to even address so I'll just post a map

I don't really understand South America. So there used to be more white people in some of the countries? So where did the non-white people come from anyway? And how could have been some of the countries more white, no one lived there before Europeans arriving or what?

Your aryan and totally black-free south divide, sir

no wonder there's so few actual blacks in Ceará and Rio Grande do Norte

go back to ruskiland vanja

Brazil's case is not the same as the rest of South América, most other countries are just a mix with spaniards and natives with some african here and there, some have barely even has euro dna like Bolívia

Natives and blacks only appeared after leftist globohomo governments or something like that. Please ignore all history from 1500-1888 and only focus on the European immigrants

It was arround 35-40% aways sure. But for a periodnof time in the intrwar to 70s lapse it was mostly descended from european inmigrants unmixed

The pardo population didnt "dissapeared
They were just less populous and then their population exploded as favellas became viable with increasing industrial output.
Thats percentual. Not gross numbers
Jannies banned my ip from posting images

There were slaves in the south but they were just few. In the northeast coast is where the epicenter was

Some countries like argentina, brazil and uruguay (so essentially the periphery of the river plate) used to be mostly of european descent and about the richest triangle in the region most of the 20th century.

A mixture of social democratic leftist policy, low fertility, neoliberalism, post dictatorship-trauma, and allowance for favella-like housing created conditions prone for lower education internal migration to lead to the construction of slums, which are basically beehives that shit welfare leeches and dont pay services

Thats percentual. Not gross numbers

Here you go

At its peak, an estimated 98,450 slaves were present in Rio Grande do Sul. This number represented about 18% of the state's population in 1872

This was the peak blackness on the south

I see and where did they Africans come from? I mean for what reason? Did you also import slaves like USA or what?

If by south you mean meridional Brazil that's not true. Rio de Janeiro and southern RS were slavery hubs, but you're right concerning other regions.

The only states that were majority White at any point are probably SP, PR, SC and RS.

yes nigga we did import slaves, the most in the americas

Nevermind half of people in poor conditions died from pests lile yellow fever and smallpox

The south of brazil shouldnt be substantially different from uruguay

*did the

In hindsight that was probably the biggest mistake ever done on the entire continent ever for every party involved

Brazil was the largest importer of African slaves. Approximately half of all slave transported through the Atlantic went to Brazil (roughly 6 million).

You can clearly see that there is not a north-south divide there. Most slaves were concentrated in the southeast. You can also see that there is dense population outside of the south.

Notice how you've been moving around your definition of south over this conversation. It started as if Brazil was just north south, now the true south is just RS?

And btw if South American countries imported slaves how come only in the USA blacks have this ethno narcissistic we-wuzzing superiority complex fused schizo victim identity? At least on the internet you don't see that outside the USA on the continent

Those are the ones im refering doe
At the mid 60s they were ablut the majority of brazil population.
Im not denying pardos were always about 30-45% of it. Thats another discussion
Im denying it had alllways had this melting pot substructure and regional homogeneity
Thats part of government mandated integration policy

Because blacks in Brazil race mixed with the rest of society

the difference is that no one gives a shit about it irl over here. you guys won't be like Brazil but like South Africa.

african americans were segregated, africans in latino countries mixed with the local population, so they didn't really developed a strong self identity like the ones in the US, their culture just became brazilian/colombian/equatorian etc culture

Parana, Rs, santa catarina, what do you call them if not "the south"?
Put up that map marking the genetic substructure of brazil. Its in the northeast that the african heritage is consolidated

Brazilian blacks are also somewhat like that. But for a general rule is just racemixed "blacks" (most pardos dont even look really black) so it comes across as somewhat delusional

the portuguese are mentally ill

The south of brazil shouldnt be substantially different from uruguay

Why noy? It had been managed by a different country with different business system for centuries. It clearly has a lot more people than Uruguay, this should give you a clue about the totally different paths they followed

Right, Brazil is 100% macaco.

You can't accurately measure it because light-skin pardos tend to pass as white. What we can safely say is that between 1940s-60s Brazil was mostly comprised by whites and light pardos due to the effects of European immigration.

You started dividing Brazil in just north and south

This map?

Most of the slave trade was handled by Brazilians and European traders such as the British and the Dutch. The Portuguese merely occupied political and bureaucratic posts and oversaw the operation.

South of Brazil....home

the blacks here who are like that are the ones brainwashed by african americans topics on twitter, vast majority don't care about that shit

our black blacks (pretos) are also mixed, they are 50% european on average

Not at least if there werent a historical integration policy and internal migration as result of industrialization and favellization.
pt.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:Geographic_ancestry_distribution_of_Brazil.png

This one
Also no i just stressed that the south wasnt majority black or pardo and it used to have the majority of brazilian population
Is just like saying here jujuy being full indio would represent argentina in the 80s when 50% of the coutnry lived in buenos aires

They are whiter overall but you can see how PR has the same level of blackness as MA and AM.

And unlike the Argentinean said the Northeast is not particularly blacker than the Southeast

Your pardos have also a very particular look

I dont know if you can like, clock venezuelans at first sight because they just look venezuelan? Well brazilians have that too.

The south of Brazil was always more populous and economically dynamic than Uruguay. And unlike Spanish colonies they weren't very autonomous to run a completely different model of society, they all answered to the Governor General of Brazil, they were all slave societies

another thread hijacked by brazilians

who cares if foreigners don't know shit or say inaccurate things about your country

there is no country in such situation here

Not yet at least, but I wouldn't be surprised if Europe becomes ≈30% white by the end of this century.

Colombia is Spanish speaking Brasil

London is already

vpn off, mutt/ivan

The south never had the majority of the Brazilian population. This is why I said you flip flop on your definition of south. You have to decide if you are including the southeast or not.

In that wikipedia map the black admixture looks almost irrelevant everywhere and I don't see it predominating in the northeast