In de yunite states police can blow your head off with an rpg if you own an incorrectly rendered set of pixel

In de yunite states police can blow your head off with an rpg if you own an incorrectly rendered set of pixel

Why are Finns so fucking mentally is

Politicians propose bills they know will be struck down by the courts because it's free politics points for their constituents and they can always blame "activist judges."

Anything that makes life more difficult and dangerous for pedophiles is a good thing.

do it, ban anime, two nukes weren't enough

this is my favorite general

did you know? the minimum marriage age was 12 until 1753

This would actually be a based happening

And we changed it because sexualizing children is gross and unecessary in a society where people live past 30.

people weren't dropping dead at 30, are you 'tarded?
also are you implying that tactical pedophilia is ok? strategic child rape? only when we really need it to keep the birthrates up. LOL

you know just because you fap to drawings of little children instead of real children doesn't make you not a pedo

im a hagchad but i still don't get why lolislop is considered worse than actual diddling
who is the victim here?

he won't get arrested or anything because there's no real victim, still doesn't change the fact that he's attracted to little kids

This flag is trying to moralize about kiddie diddling
Tell me did call of duty radicalize israelis into bombing orphans?

could you please downgrade your rate repost for 1 per day?
thanks

i didn't bomb anyone, you fap to children. We're not the same

You bombed in this thread

It isn't considered worse, it's just that most pedophiles are terminally online fags who aren't technically doing anything illegal so they're much more common to interact with.

it's never "just drawings". the moment you allow pedophiles to create any sort of nsfw community is the moment you'll start to see them try to normalize and rationalize their fantasies. look at this fucking site. there's always some faggot that tries taking it up a notch

The mesugaki will end up winning

same

Texas is a state full of golems

he's still right

IF WE DO THE RIGHT THING THEN [X] [Y] [Z] WILL HAPPEN I SWEAR!!!!

people diddle kids because the drawings o algo

and before you accuse me of no argument, you also provided none

If you look at a drawing of two dudes fucking you are looking at gay porn.

at a certain point laws dont matter. Cops just do what they feel like.

is the attraction unethical or the activity

nigga, I've seen gigabytes of BBC porn spammed and all over Anon Babble and I don't want to fuck blacks

That's bullshit and you know it.

Land of the Free

lmaooooooooooo

pardon? what exactly is bullshit here?

and looking at gay porn isn't sodomy, to follow your retarded whataboutism reasoning

If you get turned on by loli you're a pedo. Any argument against this is cope.

being a pedophile is not illegal however

every single faggot that does pedo apologia on this site started with loli drawings. exposition to pornographic material shapes sexuality or brings it out, yes

If you are intentionally seeking out gay porn for masturbation purposes you are probably a big homo. If you have a hard drive full of drawings of children in sexualized contexts it is safe to assume you're a pedophile.

see listen luigi, if you get excited by lolis then you were always going to get excited by lolis
you didnt get "shaped" into a pedo, you always were one
this narrative you're copying is what people in denial use to imply they were corrupted by the evil internet and arent actually degenerate criminals so they cant be blamed

It should be.

on this site

nice sample selection
besides, even if some people may go after kids because they saw porn, that still leaves people who don't go after kids because they are satisfied with just porn

you are free to go run for office and put up a bill for that
I don't think it would be possible to enforce thoughtcrime however, might even be uncostitutional

You are defending pedophiles you edgelord faggot.

you want to criminalize dispositions and states of mind? why don't you just make anger, sadness and inebriation illegal while you're at it

let's criminalize people for liking thinghs I don't like

also you're an edgelord o algo

yes? isn't this le freeze peach website? aren't you le freeze peach country? underaged retard

The subject of the thread is criminalizing pornographic drawings of children retard, at least read the thread before shitting out your kneejerk reaction.

you said it should be illegal to be a pedophile, i.e. to have certain sexual feelings

the majority of those who consume it wouldn't have started at all had they never been exposed to it
there's nothing wrong with using this website as a sample. it's actually the perfect example of how blurry the boundaries are, and how it can translate into people making the jump to defend the actual thing

thankfully drawings are covered under artistic expression, although you do still have those retarded obscenity laws

the majority of those who consume it wouldn't have started at all had they never been exposed to it

blatantly incorrect, since sexual proclivities have been shown to be mostly innate
those who were like that would have always been like that
your argument is essentially the gay scare, but for pedos and is equally as absurd
this isn't a drug, you don't get addicted to it

Anyway, since amerimutt can't really defend any point without resorting to arbitrary "pedo = always bad", let's look at the fact that he wasn't able to comprehend someone may not find blacks attractive >the majority of those who consume it wouldn't have started at all had they never been exposed to it
why do you think so? kids exist outside of internet, so if someone is inclined to find them attractive, he doesn't even need to see the drawings

and how it can translate into people making the jump to defend the actual thing

huh? never seen anyone do that here, outside of trannies or people who were making edgy jokes

Give it a fucking rest already. It is never about artistic expression, freedom of speech, satisfying the urge without harming anyone, all of that is bullshit. You're a pedo shitbag or an underage moron that just wants to argue. Either way I hope some laws like this will pass so we can finally start rounding you faggots up and chemically castrating you.

Do you believe that people who are attracted to, say, 17 year olds should be chemically castrated?

Give it a fucking rest already. It is never about artistic expression, freedom of speech, satisfying the urge without harming anyone, all of that is bullshit. You're a pedo shitbag or an underage moron that just wants to argue. Either way I hope some laws like this will pass so we can finally start rounding you faggots up and chemically castrating you.

Just stop retard.

Just stop retard.

It is of course about all of those things, but I don't expect some underaged 80IQ golem to comprehend anything except witch hunts and emotional populistic arguments to take away more of his rights. This is easily evident because every single post you've made in this thread is a histrionic emotional appeal to outrage and vague "common sense" generalities.

when you say that people jerk off to this to satisfy an innate predisposition you're both saying that the men who masturbate to loli are actual pedophiles

never seen anyone do that here

are you kidding, it happens all the time, even though it's a minority of users it still happens

are actual pedophiles

so?

are you kidding, it happens all the time

link me a post like that, because I legitimately never saw anyone genuinely defending the real thing

You're proposing we castrate people. I think there's good reason to expect you to be specific.

that statement is a fallacy
there are pedophiles who jerk off to loli
there are pedos who don't
there are non-pedos who jerk off to loli
there are non-pedos who don't
none of these people are committing are offenders by the legal definition of the word, because they are in the end jerking off to drawings
and since you keep confusing the groups, like I said here

It still is in some more free countries.

there are non-pedos who jerk off to loli

the fuck?

there are non-pedos who jerk off to loli

No

plenty of weird people exist in the world

were they forced to fap to that? masturbation raped?

Yes, pedophilia is defined as a sexual attraction towards prepubescents that is primary or exclusive. So you're not a pedo if you first fap to a loli and then a hag.

you are free to disagree that 2+2=4, but reality is thankfully not up to discussion by americans

I do not claim to comprehend how their minds function

Nazis and commies both need a punching bag to use to demonstrate to the world their sanity and morality. This is where pedophiles come in

So you're not a pedo if you first fap to a loli and then a hag.

do I have to give back my pedo award if I fapped to Yukari the last time?
d e s u you can bring most issues to hysteria if you involve the topic of kids anyhow

jews bomb palestinian kids

palestinians bomb jew kids

this influencer messaged 16 yr old girl that one time

neoliberals want to steal milk from primary schools

communists want to nationalize kids

and so on and so on

so?

so this wasn't a good objection and this poster was right , since people who consume loli are pedophiles who seek out drawn cp

there are non-pedos who jerk off to loli

you just said people who seek such material do so based on inclinations that are innate. now you're saying you can stumble upon and discover you like it, which is what was said before about exposition to it

there is a fundamental difference between a person who derives primary sexual gratification from such content and a person who jerked off to oyakodon once
if they persistently seek it exclusively then I'd certainly say they are pedophiles, but it would dilute the meaning of the word if you broadened the definition to include that group

loli are pedophiles who seek out drawn cp

so?

so this wasn't a good objection

I was referring to the mutt claiming that people get paraphilias if you expose them to the pornography.

Over 15 states de facto banned online pornography

Civit.ai banned noncon

Texas criminalized lolicon

America is dying.

Except nobody claimed that, it's an argument you made up in your head.

I don't think a thing such as a pedo award exists, most men are pedos so it would be quite the meaningless trophy. We cunnychads are just more honest about our desires.

are you illiterate?

I deducted this from these posts:

most men are pedos

getting technical, it would be hebe (or ephebo, I forgot which one is which)
pedophilia makes no sense for the evolution

You should stop trying to make deductions from posts outside of your own language.

Ok afro-saxon, but my point still stands. Drawings are a nothingburger.

Okay yes I have a rainbow flag on my door

Also several terrabytes of tasteful male nudes

And yes I went to a Pride rally

Me and my friends all go and drink at the gay bar so what

I'm straight

Want to come with me to the Turkish bathhouse?

Thankfully pedos are pretty much all fucking retards so there is a high chance of them getting caught.

there is no way you don't see the problem in allowing communities of pedophiles to prosper, given that you're on Anon Babble and thus can imagine how easy it would be for some faggot from a legal forum to organize private, more discreet parallel not-so-legal groups while recruiting people from the former. which is the same way trannies and people from generals create discord servers where they distribuite hormones to children.
ultimately you should not be allowed to build and organize communities around the drawn rape of minors. whether the punishment should fall on the consumer or the websites that willingly host such places is up for debate

Are you a woman?

based
seething pedos

iT's jUsT lE dRaWiNgS tHeY haVE no Le Parents

it's always the same story
try asking them if pic related is gore or not

there is no way you don't see the problem in allowing communities of pedophiles to prosper

switch porn to firearms, car driving or drugs/alcohol or really any thing that harmless people enjoy doing but can be associated with dangerous people
I recognize you

how easy it would be for some faggot from a legal forum to organize private, more discreet parallel not-so-legal groups

- subject every single post to mod review before posting
- no private messaging
problem literally solved

There is no such problem of imaginary persecution of imaginary crimes that haven't happened. If those pedos do such a thing it will be a crime and the appropriate laws already exist to punish them. Your entire scenario is a series of ifs that retroactively justifies your belief by assuming a person guilty.

Yeah I was going by the modern definition there. But, it does make a degree of sense, as those prepubescents will grow to become hebe and then ephebo and be able to breed, so it may be advantageous to claim them early.

so it may be advantageous to claim them early

the elites don't want you to know this but kids in parks are free

This thread was moved to