Explain why communism is any worse than capitalism

Explain why communism is any worse than capitalism

IMG_7779.png - 500x583, 173.76K

Tv man says it's bad

Communism would make my life shitty

Capitalism lets me make my own life shitty all by myself

Communism is when browns and gays o algo

63a.jpg - 716x687, 98.62K

how do you appropriately allocate resources without a feedback indicator?

In a functioning communism I would be unable to put myself above my peers while explicitly working AGAINST the state, and AGAINST the people that runs it
I like doing that because I dislike people

communism has only truly been practiced twice, only done successfully by white people (Germans and Cubans)

in both situations it worked fine, but the truth is that any socioeconomic/political ideologies will function fine when done by white people

it's heretical according to the Catholic church and therefore anyone that is a communist is outside of salvation

because i would be forced to work in gommunism

the leader issues a stupid order

subordinates get the economy messed up by following that order

they all lie, saying that the order has worked well and the efficiency has increased (it decreased in reality), because they'd get punished otherwise

the leader gets satisfied and confident. he strengthens his stupid order

the economy gets messed up further

it happened multiple times in my neighboring countries.

Because only weak, pathetic, faggot ass losers need communal anything.
t. lived in a co-op during college for a semester. Any left wing commie faggot on Anon Babble is really a lazy piece of shit that can't even do dishes because its oppressive.

When I get to shitpost on a communist built smartphone on a communist data infrastructure, I will kneel to communism

Unironic communism is cringe
Unironic capitalism is cringe

Market communism is just capitalism with communist characteristics

Which is heaven on earth.

87311.png - 1920x1080, 994.8K

God, young people these days are so fuckin stupid

the cia told me communism is bad

see

she wants to pick a fight

cute

Huh? Retarded 19 year old women and immature fags like you are the only ones pushing commie shit. Become self-aware for once, dickhead

Welcome back deng

xijinp.jpg - 828x627, 51.02K

cubans

white

You live in Miami don’t you

communism is too large scale, it will never work. what we need is tribalism

It's unachievable, you will just get hypercontrolling dictatorship that promises paradise but delivers a cartoonish evil dystopia stuck in antiquated notions of productive cicles and working conditions that are unironically worse than in developed capitalist countries.
Unless they pull up a China, which is still a dictatorship with bad working conditions, but livable, and with cool skycrappers.

China basically just made capitalism and communism have sex

It's fundamentally true. The communal rules of the co-op play out exactly like communist rhetoric through and through. Lazy, pathetic, stupid people love the part where they get to "eat free food," but then suddenly disappear when it's their turn to clean up other people's mess. Everyone is miserable, yet they display either a "I dont care" or "this is great attitude" depending on how much money their mom and dad are supplying them in the meantime.

Yeah and wouldn't you know it? The vast, vast majority of their population live like insects and eat sewage oil.

Yeah and wouldn't you know it? The vast, vast majority of their population live like insects and eat sewage oil.

youtube.com/watch?v=kGc3DM1qAf8

dude watch this check mark youtuber that shills fuckin vpns in his videos

Hello little kid, I actually taught English in China for 2 years. It fucking sucks, and is hardly above Africa.

Heavily centralized control that promises to dissolve all forms of state (including themselves) and class by stringing along their public with 5 year plans until utopia is achieved. The lighter more socially acceptable form of communism is state capitalism that does exactly the same thing only they make no promises to dissolve the state, don't tell you about their plans, and will unceremoniously exit the second their state fails. Then there's vanilla capitalism that wants senseless production and to flood markets with garbage and grow infinitely on the hopes that there's always an excess of people to consume garbage. Choose your poison basically.

they're equally bad
but capitalist cunts controlled more assets and means of production at the moment so

Communists in 2024 are not serious people

Ergo capitalism wins by default

cubans are whiter than Slavs, Baltics, Kavkaz, and Analbanians

Cuban communism was ass

cuban communism has unironically outperformed and been more stable than anything produced by the rest of LATAM simply because they’re white compared to all of you, save for maybe uruguay

Communism, an ideology which advocates for a stateless, classless, moneyless society, is simply not feasible. It requires a set of assumptions about human nature and future material conditions which are so foreign to our current reality as to be delusional. On a functional level, every time socialism has been attempted (the transitionary form of economic development on the road to communism) it has been horribly inefficient and/or a ruthless nightmare of slaughter and suffering. There are many problems with capitalism, and I think communists make many very good points about it, but there seems to be no better alternative as of yet.

Weird hypercontrolling dystopia.
Is not even good in theory, (in practice is just diet fascism). It has a heavy liberal substract so it always tends to morbity and random appeals to emotion
It also tends to lead into practices like affirmative action which makes it an extremely easy system of hierachies and nepotism hijacked by more predatory and self-sufficient groups like ethnic mafias

Hence why the soviet regime was ran by a couple ethnic mafias with some diversity hires.

After the soviets fell the DNC has been reconfigurating its rethoric to fill the void they left and adopt all of its potential following
Socialist babble is the status quo. We are not in reagan era
Liberals whine about "capitalism" (a invented strawman abstract) and pat each others back over it all the time

reject communism

embrace hypercapitalism

hypercapitalism leads to massive consolidation among corporations as they seek monopoly pricing power

giga globohomos control basically all of the production capacity

giga globohomo top executives' decisions have the same level of effect on global economies as the Soviet Union's State Planning Committee deciding how many pairs of boots will be produced in the next year

hypercapitalism replicated the worst aspect of communism (central planning) but without any safeguards (corporations are not accountable to citizens, but USSR bureaucrats were subject to public pressures if not weekly opinion polls like in western democracies)

all the dangers and no safeties

Nothing is worse than anything cause reality is hell no matter what
Kill all societal improoovers

Tragedy of the co-op...

Because it always, ALWAYS involves gangs of discontent poor masses taking their frustration out on the slightly-less-poor rather than the rich.

They never kill the entire royalty class or the entire politician class, the poor farmers kill the farmers who used to be poor five years ago but managed, through hard work and some luck, to get slightly ahead

The kulak massacres

Communism is for womyn not for men. This is important to accept, it only works if you are a womyn.

Yakub.png - 340x447, 134.06K

Search "communist countries", then search "capitalist countries". No better metric than reality

Petite bourgeois cope you are the unwitting foot soldiers of the capitalist class

Cool thank you for that, now that you've dropped the same robotic smug insults copied from the little red book, I can really see why it made sense for some poor farmers to murder the other poor farmers who had managed to make a profit

tsmt

Not being able to own anything AND being poor at the same time sort of is the worst of both worlds.

The kulak is the tool of the capitalist. The petite bourgeois actively enabled the oppression of the proletariat. His role and his sublimation by the proletariat is necessary for the dialectical development and movement of history

Anon, you are proving his point. Those subscriptions services are privately owned generate huge profits. The idea of renting out your services to someone else has nothing to do with communism.