Are what we call "Eurocentric beauty standards" universal? Both of these women are Indian but one fits the Eurocentric ideal better. Is she objectively more attractive or is it the Eurocentrism? There isn't anything objectively ugly about the woman on the left.
Are what we call "Eurocentric beauty standards" universal...
Would impregnate both
Both are hot.
Eurocentric beauty standards
This is just some cope with there being waay more ugly people outside of europe
Who are they?
left is an incel factory
I think the one on the right is more attractive, but not due to more Euro-like features necessarily
Left just has a left attractive face with the overly proeminent cheekbones for my taste
I actually prefer lefts skin tone for example
Beauty is subjective. Attraction beyond basic indicators of health (clear skin, healthy hair, low body fat, youth) are learned when we’re young. White women are presented as the ideal, and they are often presented in a hyper sexual way.
Indian women have some bad pr in the west but it’s not as bad as black women. They’re often not allowed to even be presented as sexual beings at all in the media- they’re motherly figures, or they’re presented in video games and film as ‘realistic’ characters. Black women are rarely presented as sexually attractive beings..
Indian women aren’t in the worst shape and things are getting better for them representation wise. It’s the mens image we need to worry about rehabing the most.
God punjabis from South Delhi are so uncanny valley
They almost look human
You probably like her bright eyes and the contrast of skin and hair. It’s absolutely her euro features that you like
She look Filipina
I'm 40 though
Because left has the cheekbone thing too
Nah I dislike that weird green eye shade a bit. I prefer either dark blue, dark green, brown, grey, or pitch black but on people with light skin like Anne Hathaway. Call me crazy but I dislike bright blue and bright green eyes
And her skin and hair are low contrast, both being light. What?
If you dislike all this things then how is she more attractive. She’s not low contrast, the other girls is low contrast. Right is high contrast by definition..
her skin is very light and her hair is dark. Her eyes are not brown so they add contrast.
Left has brown skin, dark eyes, dark hair- that’s low contrast.
Both of them look low contrast to me
Rights hair is still fairly light relative to her skin tone
Right would be actual high contrast if she had lefts hair color
I thought white People are really only low contrast when they’re blonde, idk. This little chart would place her in the middle I think
right is objectively more attractive I don't give a fuck about eurocentric beauty standards
This is high contrast
desu-usergeneratedcontent.xyz
Yeah I know. The girl on the right is closer to that than this which is low contrast. Or at least she’s in the middle.
Men are far less picky. The difference between women is much smaller than the difference between men. Some men like Asian girls, some like black women, some like Asians, some like short girls, sone like tall, some like busty, and some like flat boobs. Women are a hive mind; they all want tall white Chad.
It's difficult to judge this objectively because women are such a hive mind, and they love status. Whites are objectively more attractive, but other factors are giving white men an edge. Something to keep in mind is that women can marry into a tribe in a way that men can't. If women perceive one tribe to be significantly stronger than the other, they will do everything they can to join that tribe, even if it is an enemy tribe. This is because throughout most of human history, men would be killed off in war, and women would mate with the victors.
Objectivity doesn’t exist when it comes to this though.. she’s more attractive to you.
No.. the complete opposite is true actually.
You’re just an incel who doesn’t go outside enough to see real human relationships.
Also you contradict yourself
Men are far less picky.
Then go on to describe picky behaviour
Some men like Asian girls, some like black women, some like Asians, some like short girls, sone like tall,
All you guys do is come on here and pick apart women’s appearances and hyper focus on certain ethnicities and races. It’s so weird.
Women don’t do that. You’d know that if you had female friends or talked to women at all.
No, ethnic women like white men far more than ethnic men like white women. There is good data on this.
Men have diverse preferences, and they are willing to compromise on those preferences. If you are a short girl, there are plenty of men who are into that. If you are a short guy, then no girl will like that about you. Heck, some men like fat girls. Men are willing to drop their preferences for a good personality, but women want a 6-foot+ rich guy or nothing. Backed up by science.
Left is more attractive
This is not true at all. Most men in Asia are shorter than 5”9 and most are married. A lot of white men are short and married, the numbers are that dire.
What you’re saying about women’s rigid preferences is objectively untrue. I feel sad for you, you’re clearly very stuck in your ways. You won’t change your life without a growth mindset, you should look that up- growth mindset vs. Fixed mindset
Only one study found this and it had a small sample size and looked only in the United States.
Emilia Clarke is the Whitest
kek
is right white or a light indian?
indians are 30-40% Caucasian. her being 1/8th indian doesn't mean she has any substantial non-Caucasian genetics
source please
Tall men have more sexual partners, more children, and happier marriages.
telegraph.co.uk
southcoasttoday.com
medium.com
Everything I have said is backed up by studies. None of it is just conjecture. The first thing women do when you speak the truth is shame you. They never debate the data.
Caucasian (as defined now) and White are different tho
Based
Are you under 5 foot 7? When these studies talk about short men, they’re referring to men under 5”7.
The data also says short men marry younger wives and have longer marriages.
None of these studies say that you yourself can’t have a happy marriage or get married.. nothing here indicates that.
Jeg
Most psychotic response you could’ve had to this.
Why
nope. indian Caucasian genetics are indo-europeans who came from Europe
It's not like 5'7 is the same as 6'3. It gets better the taller you get. Here is how much extra income men need to have the same dating success as a taller man (pic). Shorter men do more household chores, buy more gifts for their spouse, and give their spouse more attention. They have to compensate by simping.
cbsnews.com
I'm probably a schizo, but you can sort of see it in her. The facial and cranial measurements do not reflect that of the typical Yakubian within a millimetre range.
sure anglos will fuck the left one
I also like high contrast foids, let me tell you about this blonde foid in my class back in elementary school. She was all blonde and everything but she looked way too light, and then one day and I will never forget how my jaw literally dropped and stood and just stare at her all while blushing, she dyed her hair reddish brown and she looked like a fkn angel. She looked so fucking beautiful and hot with dark hair, my eyes couldn’t stop gazing at her.
Could be worse. You could be a black woman, I don’t want to hear it from you anymore
Why am I accurate?
How tall are you? Why are you so invested in this topic?
depends on your aesthetic imprint. my ideal would be the left, with the right's skin color and the skin color only.
as it stands though, the right just barely makes my high-contrast imprint tingle more than the muted contrast of the left due to her darker skin.
Maybe.
Do Indians consider women on the left ugly just because she is brown?
fellow high-contrast enjoyer..
i dont care what race a foid is as long as she has fair skin and dark hair and eyes.. w leptorrhic yet button nose.
HNGHHHHHHHH
I mean.. that rules out alot of races
Maybe what? What the fuck is wrong with you?
no it doesnt. literally the entirety of where caucasoids to the mongoloid spectrum. actually usually the fusion zone.
NEA, MENA, LATAM, certain Euros, Central Asians. etc.
even fair-skins from brown zone can qualify.
this is now a high-contrast appreciator thread. no inferior low-contrast foids allowed.
post all your highest-prized high-contrast qt3.14s
No.
fugoff
Fuck you.
most inclusive, most beautiful, peak feminine archetype
fugyou
if you're gonna post low-contrast, only kuruminhas allowed, bitch.
It excludes all black girls
no sexo lust-maxxing low-contrastbrown harlots.
only high-contrast waifus who should be cherished and loved. never seggs'd
Are what we call "Eurocentric beauty standards" universal?
Nah
Wrong. high contrast obsidian queens mog low-contrast 'black' girls.
I officially don’t understand high contrast low contrast.
Tfw no high contrast gf, only ever dated SEA asians and blonde whites.
Why live bros, these girls don't dig my pale ale.
nobody ever talks about how oppressive arab beauty standards are, 50 year old women are expected to look like drag queens
it's the contrast between the background (skin) and the focus points (eyes+hair).
once you get this black, the way light reflects (esp if she's cooltoned), the white shines against the black background + whites of her eyes and teeth.
dont worry, only high-contrast chads understand.
Actually the surroundings, society and culture also very likely affect perception of attractiveness.
ugh.. yes, the most overrated low-cont aryan and SEAs
your only hope for low-cont is picrel
Post more black girls. I’m tired of whites and Asians
All men like some variation of the exact same face and features. You all want the same exact thing no matter her contrast
95% of women dont look like that and they all get married
One thing I'll say is that I really don't like it when women's eye color is darker than their hair color
I don't think it's eurocentrism because it existed long before europeans became a world power. Arab enslavers went crazy over slavic blonde women, but were more indifferent to the Black African concubines they enslaved. White concubines were sold off as far away as India. Even in Roman times, the Italians went crazy for Germanic blondes, to the point where Italians were shaving the hair of their german slave girls and wearing it as a wig.
Even amongst white countries, they often default to the blonde aryan look for propaganda. The Americans during the war mimicked the Nazi blonde ideal for their coomerbait women.
blocks your path.
wrong
Get fucked asshole
Blonde is rare, I don’t think that means it’s better.
blonde aryanism started to get canonized with the global anglo power structure. the low contrast, 'elvish' phenotype represented peak feminine, purity, and softness. arab and indian fascination with white women even back then is because these societies had aryan elites at one point or another which canonized their status. same reason why browns simp over them today due to european colonization.
there is objectivity to beauty, but youd be surprised how much of it has to do with imprint, and power/elite/status association.
which is why in the west where black culture reigned supreme for a generation now, you have the avatar of white woman co-opting black aesthetic: Kim Kardashian, who just ended up looking latina but the exaggerated features give her away. she was trying to attain/co-opt black features.
low cont propaganda can get fugt.
No one likes black women though, not even their own men like them.
The 1920s film starlets bucked this trend hard tho
yea because of their attitude lmao. most black men who are proud to be black would in vast majority of cases prefer a black woman, but high status black males only seem to attract annoying black women with impossibly high standards so they go with the more feminine white women. similar to how white men go with the more feminine asian women.
yea their optics haven't helped a lot but it is what it is, but in this day and age of hypermasculine females, femininity is the end-all-be-all that trumps all. i'm a high contrast enjoyer with very specific imprint but ive been around very soft, very feminine, religious nigerian girls and their exuding femininity was like a catnip to a cat on crack. you can start there sis.
Are you a man? Are you white?
Here's a book on it. In the western world, there was only two hundred years where blonde was out of fashion. I think it was from around 1500-1700, it was the one time where you had blonde women dying their hair black instead of the reverse. The rest of the time you had women always dying their hair blonde, just like the rest of the world does today.
It's funny, the author actually tried interviewing women's study's professors on blonde hair and the women experience. And literally none would answer the question, it was like a third rail. And if you look at reviews for the book, you have catfights and seetheposting.
A lot of why white people are actually white is likely sexual selection. Lighter skin is actually a sign of youth, people are more pale when they're younger.
I feel you may be a woman or something
It's largely due to with wealth, looks. Not all of it matters a lot.
Mrs. Pitman, who is the photography critic for the Times of London, reports that brunettes have wanted to be blondes since at least Classical times. The ancient Greeks, for example, clearly thought blonde women were the most beautiful. The poet Homer described the goddess Athena as having gray eyes and Aphrodite, the goddess of love, as having blonde hair. One of the most famous and most visited sculptures of the ancient world was the Aphrodite of Knidos, sculpted by Praxiteles in 360 B.C. She had blonde hair — the Greeks painted their statues, so there was no mistake about this — as did the myriad copies of this statue that decorated the temples, gardens, and villas of the Greek city-states. Pliny the Elder wrote that people traveled great distances to marvel at this beautiful and even erotic sculpture. One man was so overcome with desire for the blonde Aphrodite, that late one night he sneaked into the temple to be alone with the statue: “He embraced it intimately; and a stain bears witness to his lust.”
This passion for blondes offended the pride and patriotism of some Roman men. Mrs. Pitman quotes the poet Ovid, who castigated Roman women for “using rinses” and dangerous “concoctions” in their quest for blondeness. There were safer ways to seek beauty: “[A]fter our German conquests a wig is easily come by — a captive Mädchen’s tresses will see you through, . . . eliciting admiration galore.” However, he warns women to remember, “The praise (like the hair) has been bought. Once you really deserved it. Now each compliment belongs to some Rhine maiden, not to you.”
blonde hair
black eyebrows
Explain
Well blonde is a sign of youth. Most blondes, loose their natural colour in their 20s naturally. Unless they’re Nordic
It is understandable that women might want to look more like rulers or conquerors, but the women of Rome wanted to look like enemies who had been defeated and enslaved. Surely, only blondes have been envied and imitated even in defeat. Southern belles had no desire to resemble their African slaves, nor did English lasses imitate the features of the subject races of the British empire. Nor did American girls during the 1960s try to look Vietnamese. The Roman preference for blondes seems to have been more than a matter of fashion or a passing desire for the exotic.
Mrs. Pitman has found that if European men of the Middle Ages had a passion for fair-haired women, so did the Arabs who were their principal foreign foe. During the Crusades, the twelfth-century Arab historian Imad ad-Din records the arrival of “three hundred lovely Frankish women, full of youth and beauty, . . . loving and passionate, pink-faced and unblushing . . . blue-eyed and grey-eyed,” who had come to offer comfort and companionship to their male countrymen. Mrs. Pitman also cites the account of Ibrahim ibn Jaqub, a tenth-century Spanish Jew who converted to Islam, and traveled in northeastern Europe. He wrote that one of the purposes of his journeys was to purchase blonde prisoners for Turkish and Arab customers. By contrast, European knights did not bring home dark-skinned Middle Eastern brides.
Mrs. Pitman writes that the next 200 years were an anomaly in an otherwise blonde millennium, as dark hair came into fashion, at least among the upper classes. This may have reflected the rise of France as the preeminent power. The ideal beauty now had dark brown or black hair with a fair complexion. During this period, natural blondes actually sought to conceal their true color by wearing wigs or dying their hair. Women from poor families could not afford these artifices, and the aristocracy and upper bourgeoisie associated blondness with lower-class promiscuity.
Life is not fair.
Regrettably, Mrs. Pitman devotes little space to the last several decades. The triumph of multiculturalism and anti-white ideologies has failed to displace blondes from their pre-eminence in fashion, film, and even pornography. The blonde continues to be sought after by men worldwide. In Brazil, for example, the two provinces in the southeast that have large German ethnic populations supply the vast majority of models for the local fashion industry.
Mrs. Pitman notes that even in so successful a country as Japan, light skin and Caucasian features are at a high premium. In the streets of Tokyo every fourth or fifth woman seems to lighten her hair — some going all the way to full blonde — and even men are beginning to dye their hair. As one blonde Japanese 20-year-old explains, “It’s a form of rebellion, rejecting my Japaneseness in order to look more Western, to look better.” It is fashionable for Japanese women to have their epicanthic folds removed surgically, to take the “slant” out of their eyes and make them look rounder and more Caucasian.
Although Mrs. Pitman does not mention this, Africa and the Caribbean are large markets for hair dyes and skin bleaches, even for crude, caustic products that harm users. Likewise, most of the women who appear on Mexican television could almost be mistaken for Norwegians.
Mrs. Pitman, herself an attractive English blonde, draws few lessons from her illuminating study but she does ask a few tantalizing questions. She notes that many whites who are not natural blondes dye their hair in the hope of “passing,” and wonders: “Are those who blonde themselves still subconsciously seeking to distinguish themselves from darker and less powerful ethnic groups?” Mrs. Pitman concedes that non-white women have often turned themselves blonde but never permits herself to wonder whether at some level they may wish they were white.
i am a man, not white. what makes you think im a woman.
most whites arent actually that white, they're pink-hued. yes sexual selection def plays a role but if it was purely a youth-coded selection, whites would also be neotenous, which they're the further away from that.
Omg are you the black guy??
This book would just piss me off
No. i'm self-appreciating NEA man. You should do the same.
lmao stop consuming blackpills on Anon Babble. what are you even doing here as a black girl? it's not good for your mental health this is where thick-skinned autist retards come to shitpost.
It’s terrible for my mental health, really fucks with my self esteem.
get off it.. this is the worst place to be for blacks and girls, and you got the double whammy. even then this place is relatively hella more tame than places like Anon Babble
dont be fat, do what you can to lookmax, most of all, femininity-maxx, and you're gonna make it.
I feel bad now, I was just doing my usual race sperging.I didn't realize it'd hurt feelings.
Don't take this site too seriously
int is for ironic race sperging lmao why arent you in pol shilling amren wignat shit? you'd have more of an audience of both wignats and other races to cause a shitstorm. no1 reads paragraphs of green copypastas here.
Because Anon Babble has an average IQ of like 85, and I got banned from rdrama for race sperging there.
Tyla is half Indian and only a quarter Black/White.