VGHHHHH

VGHHHHH

the moral scolding hag alliance

That will plant nukes on your border :-)

I love the EU so much bros

EU + Canada would unironically be a trade titan with the new northern sea lanes opening up

VGHHHHHH THE JEET ARAB ALLIANCE VGHHHH

tf tp

yeah and canada has so many natural resources that europe needs, it's a match made in heaven

Imagine not being a colony of america as a whole but a colony of the democrat party.
Like man, not even worthy of the whole uniparty behind, the gay half of america is enough to run these lame ass vassals

sweden doesn't even have nukes

lmao europeans talk and fantasize, that's literally it
failing continent

Damn nigga you can't even read in your own native tongue, you fucking retarded. Literally can't comprehend 1 sentence and additional context LOL

european union with canada

What is even the point of the european union being a thing if they just fantasize about including random countries with resources
At that rate just start shilling for the UN man.
Invite india even, after all everyone is the same other than in economic zone
Hell, even those economic zones make no sense, what makes them more valid than others?

Northern sea lanes

aww hell nah

You can just have worldwide lanes.
The attahement to the social construct of europe comes across as arbitrary once you deny the ethnic padameters.
Why even limiting it to "the europe". Is a economic loss, and anyway the consideration is that anuone inside regardless of their race, culture or beliefs is the same.
So what even makes european union more valid than any other claim of legitimacy and sovereignity? Or the current borders more valid than any other?

Like
From an economic standpoint why would you even have an european union when you can just integrate the markets to the entiee planet and thats it? Lol
Just add japan, india, china. Whatever dude.
At some point is just a "cult of borders" where you mindlessly worship some arbitrary lines on a map over other lines on a map just because

Don't be stupid.
Canada would be annexed in a second if there was any chance of nukes being place there.
WW3 was almost started because the Soviets tried this in Cuba.

You won't do shit, bacon boy

Just annex the entire world, bro.

Ok, working on it. Canada first.

No but they did get very close
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_nuclear_weapons_program

annex

Trade agreements and economic integration*
Half of the planet wouldnt mind because its a net economic benefit
Is just that you just have a strange cult of borders that does not even makes sense economically nor socially

This makes BRICS shit bricks

The point of the EU is eventual annexation or federalization. Economic union and beneficial terms is the first step so it can be done peacefully.

Why?

To eclipse the USA and China and be a third pole of the world.

Canada is a Timmy nation, and as the saying goes, fuck Timmy gonna do.

so it can be done peacefully

good luck with that

The point of the EU is eventual annexation or federalization

Anexxation into what?
You would need to define something that characterises why he european union is a thing other than borders it just happens to exist on.

To eclipse the USA and China and be a third pole of the world.

That is not economically the most profitable option, competition damages competitors
The premise behind this map is that some american land full of indians and europe is the same, so follwoing that premise you could play out fr all of nafrica, brazil, india, china, etc and have much more accesible and developed markets and natural resources.
So why not exactly?
Where does the line on where a country starts or end is defined? What defines it? What legitimizes it? That the local people believes it? What ammount? What if a local town has 10 people that feel their own country?

Many cases of it. See several US states or Russian states. History illiterate.

You have a naive understanding of geopolitics. It's an anarchic system all about power, and being a slew of fragmented mini-countries is a losing strategy that invites being domineered by US and China

Maybe later more will be annexed, but there is a clear reason for it today.

If you believe it's game theoretically sound to be a bunch of irrelevant mini-states, why does not every US state move to dissolve the union? It's the smartest play correct? Just dissolve your superpower federation lol.

US states

comparable

holy KEK

You have a naive understanding of geopolitics

I'm quite certain i am much more knowledgeable about geopolitics than you are.
Im question the legitimacy of the European Union in this shape as some sort of entity as the premise behind its idnividuality is incoherent to the premise behind its shape

The question is why would the european union benefit from being dominated by itself, in its current shape, other than bring dominated and anexxed by the US and or china.
Given the fact that both the US and China gaining power and anexxing thw territories would improve economic indicators for everyone involved

Why european union with canada and not european union with US, Russia, and China? Every human is the same everywhere, values are individual and dicferent from person to person, languages are not shared and by the first premise it is inly logic that the most democratic option is for the global majority to run each territory. Otherwise microstates would be no less legitimate than any macrostate

Im asking you to define who is "you"
Canada is an american colony that opens an attack vector for america to deconfigurate your markets anyway.
The mossad jews are smarter than you

After being locked out of the oil resources and mineral respurces of russia and the cheap labour from china you are dependant on a israeli trade axis with india through the persian gulf (coming soon tm) to get oil and cheap labour sourced products

That argument can be applied to any multiethnic empire. There can be diverse federations or empires. But eventually it will be homogenized for stability and unity, but it is a very long term goal.

The current starter for reason to join the union is massive collective bargaining power, certain values that people like and are rare throughout the world, and economic prosperity.

Why not integrate Russia and Turkey too then?

We will, in due time.

After being locked out of the oil resources and mineral respurces of russia

Yep, that is what happens when you are weak and let the US sabotage you. Relations with Russia will normalize eventually and cheap energy will return.

That argument can be applied to any multiethnic empire

Empires are normally based on the dominion, -et impera-, of a recognizabe dynasty or elite class.
The european union is formally a thing at all for utilitarian and economic uses.
And the most utilitarian and economically efficient path is to simply be annexxed by america or china, as it will expand your markets and goods more than mantaining the EU alive any second.
To mantain the EU is a net loss economically.

But eventually it will be homogenized for stability

Simmetry breaks, time only goes forward, homogeneity is impossible in biological systems. The simpler a system is, the more organisms will begin predating it.

The current starter for reason to join the union is massive collective bargaining power

But the union becoming larger and the notion of joining a union already tackles bergainin power, to join it is to cede individuality, an the more join it the more.

certain values that people like and are rare throughout the world

Values are individual, half of your country certainly does not has the same values as the other half, you are in opposition to said values by imposing your rule over them and some arbitrary rule over the land.
But for that matter? Im pretty sure you share those "values" with all of latin america, 70% of asia, all of north america and half of africa.

and economic prosperity

Economic prosperity would be more easily attainable by submitting to china or america or russia.

russia.

economic prosperity

lmao

Why would India join the EU?

Why would Texas join the USA?

Russia would be economically prosperous if it had no conflict with the EU and thus formed a common market.

To actively antagonize russia is economically unprofitable
War and any engagement in notions such as borders or regulation are economically detrimental measures.
Im yet waiting to see what the "EU" exactly represents
Its seems more like a multinational company than anyhing

nowaygians, bongs and icelandlets will have to fild in or be used as slaves in computer chips factories and see their women force bred

The EU is a border idiotic faggot.
You can just submit to china and ta-da.
What is the argument behind mantaining the EU instead of joining the superior and preexisting territorial superpowers?
Each second the EU exists is a second of economic prosperity stolen.
Hell, even if you werent absorbed
Multiple balkanized states would rapidly see their domestic economies outcompeted by foreign investment and integrated in broader global markets as they become dependant in larger markets for resources, thus, breaking borders quicker than the EU could

The less self-reliable a economy is = the quicker it is integrated into a broader one

We need to split into micro-states for make trade easier and less border!

every single black, pajeet, chink and hispanic in north america either directly moves to europe or illegally crosses into canada first and then proceeds to live off of gibs in the eu

Vghhhhhh what should have been

my understanding of post-industrial capitalism comes medieval kangdoms

Sovl

Holy shit you are dumb.

Circumference of 1 circle with area 1 is smaller than circumference of 2 circle each with area 0.5. Less border, less individual regulations by making it a big unified blob.

Less border

Borders are met with a threshold when it comes to self-reliability.
The larger a border is, the less it relies on integrated markets to met it necessities, thus, the more this border will dispose itself to -protect the border- than it will dispose itself to prosperity or to the markets.
Smaller borders also provide a basis for lobbying/investment over super-regulated markets which enable service economies based on substracting capital and especulation over the substracted capital from foreign investors.
This is why small worthless economies in america like those of new england became service economies, because they get poured in more investment than they need shaped as lobbying.

Turns out a culture of e-coli evolves faster than a pack of elephants becauae it is smaller and more susceptible to external pressures and internal necessities.

Maybe there is an economic argument to be made. But you neglect realpolitik and influence from big actors. Another part of the EU is defence and becoming a hegemon.

Your economic argument can be realized inside a massive EU, just like it was realized for New England inside the massive USA.

But you neglect realpolitik

The basis of politics is the enemy-friend distinction. You first would need to define who si not you, and it just seems that by defining your friend and yourself as "anyone that is inside some random imagined lines that depend on who is imagining them and whoever is imagining them is equally valid no matter where" is kinda pretty self defeating

Any instance of warhawking is to be met with diatrust, as we are ralking about a ourely economic entity that is in fact not even providing material wealth for its existence.
So why should it be protected as an institution? What is to defend and from who?
Or enabled to become a hegemon?
If your desire is to live inside a hegemonic state just submit your state to the US or china, after all, is the same. Everyone is. No?
Defense? Why would you even suggest engage in a war when that simply ruins prosperity.
Peace and wealth is more easily attained through submission

Wouldn't be opposed to this at all. One of those city-states could have actually reasonable laws like the 2nd amendment and legal 3D cunny.

i'm sure it's partially an economic argument