Fascism doesn't work

Fascist italy worked fine tho

We wen't from being one of the greatest countries in the world to a browner version of Bulgaria

one of the greatest countries in the world

If that was true then why were you bleeding people worse than india? My great grandparents didnt warped here from thin air

Fascism

Fashies came later.
They had the second most statized economy after soviets
Clearly fascist economy is not an issue given it works on praxis exactly the same as chink economy which is rapidly developing + incentivizes jobs, fertility and enslaving subversive adversarial groups

I've done good, so there is an exit from hell

They had the second most statized economy after soviets

Then they lost the war

is drinking milk healthy?

>NO!

proof?

>*shots you with a shotgun*

???

The argument that "fascism doesn't work" is often supported by historical evidence and analysis of the outcomes in societies where fascist regimes have been implemented. Here are some key reasons why fascism has generally been seen as ineffective or destructive:

1. Economic Failures:
Fascist regimes often rely on centralized control of the economy and can promote autarky (economic self-sufficiency). However, this approach has typically resulted in inefficiencies:

Italy under Mussolini: Despite early promises of economic revitalization, Mussolini's regime saw a decline in Italy's industrial output and standard of living. Fascist policies failed to address the underlying structural issues of the economy, leading to stagnation and eventual collapse.
Nazi Germany: While Nazi Germany did achieve some short-term economic success, largely through militarization and rearmament, the long-term consequences were devastating. The focus on war preparation rather than sustainable growth, coupled with the inefficiency of state-run enterprises, led to massive destruction during World War II. After the war, Germany had to rebuild almost entirely from scratch.

If fascism worked it would have been on the opposite end of the shotgun

thanks USAGPT

Meat hook, really

Fascism only gives you a temporary cohesion and production boost but makes you chimp out against your neighbrours because its based on picking an enemy and making society fight it, but once you have dealt with internal enemies all you have are external enemies.

The only reason chile and argentina became rivals is because two dictatorships were in power and could not avoid chimping out.

now lets see what he has to say about communism

The debate over whether communism "works" depends on how one defines "works" and the criteria used to judge economic or social systems. Historically, many argue that communist systems have faced significant challenges, which are often cited as evidence against its practical implementation.

depends on how one defines "works"

yeah the cope is already in the first paragraph, nice "AI"

Furthermore, it aims to recreate an ancient heirarchy in modern conditions. And guess what did those ancient heirarchies do in the past? Wage war all the fucking time, constant war, Europe, Asia, whenever, non stop war.

1945

Italy simultaneously proved that Fascism could work just fine, and that it could also be utterly retarded
Truth be told, I don't consider it to be more or less efficient than most other forms of governance, but placing so much power in a single figure can have unpredictable consequences

Fascism only gives you a temporary cohesion and production boost but makes you chimp out against your neighbrours because its based on picking an enemy and making society fight it, but once you have dealt with internal enemies all you have are external enemies.

For one, no. Altough its quite obvious life itself is about fighting against the very external forces and a constant process of natural selection of evolution. That is, a reactionary tendency towards external pressures.
Needless to say the external enemy argument is the same for all systems. That is more a matter of political rallying than it is one of actual ideological substance
America used MC-carthysm/red scare. Commies go after their own reactionaries then after the foreign antirevolutionaries, capitalists and "imperialists". Not casual polpot killed a quarter of his population and soviet negroes went after hohols and kazakhs.
The idea of fighting against external forces as you exist under threat is incredibly inspiring for the population
This is why modern progressives fell for third worldism and had their ideologgy consumed by reactionary ethnonationalist sentiments (indigenism, anti-imperialism with a nationalist twist, black identity, faggot identity politics) and they have a grey-scare type dialectic against fascism, and abstract enemies like "the rich", "reactionaries", "incels", "racists", "white supremacy", "nazis"

Dictatorship does not equate fascism
Fascism has an ideological background. Is not just some loose authoritarianism, it is actually substantially colectivistic and requires a present state. Dictators here were liberals.
Read gentile.

ironically, it's a lot like communism. Nation/state over individuals, state controls pretty much everything and individual liberties are not a thing.
Though because it was never fully adopted or lasted too little, it never developed completely.

That is like saying capitalism doesn't work because the USA got beaten by communist rice farmers and goat herders hiding in caves.

Reaction has defined the 'right' since its inception in the French Revolution. They still use the term 'Thermidor Reaction' to describe when revolutionary elements revert back to state control. Any real diplomacy was being carried out in Geneva by plenipotentiaries while states were reduced to parliamentary circuses, rock-eating nationalism, and neo-imperialistic facades. Nearly every single nationalized emperor in Europe during the 19th century was related to Queen Victoria.

Fascism leads to too much corruption, since the businesses constantly need to secure the favour of the state, unlike in a liberal system. Though you need to have a strict definition of Fascism before you can give concrete examples of it.

Not so ironically. A large ammount of fascists including mussolini and Gentile were communists before

Reversion is unnecesary, darwinist and evolutionist reaction is only a logical conclussion. Revolutionary materialism simply distilles itself into morbidity if not rapidly hijacked by more predatory elements

Failed experiments like the soviet project got rapidly hijacked by more predatory elements like ethnic mafias.
Capable of reacting and evolving while preserving integrity
Unsurprisingly it quickly became a facade for georgian and jewish mafias

Socialism in one state is a polite way to say fascism, it really isn't any different than national socialism. Although things like syndicalism aren't exactly the same thing, syndicalism is more like being run by corporations, national syndicalism however is the exact same thing as fascism. The only thing that differentiates political leanings is degree of state control, in some cases I'd say the US (apart from the federal government) is very far left until Reagan most of the ideas behind things like libertarianism were related to anarcho-syndicalism, but socialism is so blended with internationalism that you can't separate the two anymore. Most of these terms are meaningless by this point.

Except the us is still around

Failed experiments like the soviet project

The fact that most economic planning is experimentation undermines the very idea of progress. It's merely competing datasets. I wonder why we haven't yet given up the ghost.

Pfff all respects where due.
What is so good about an authoritarian gov't based on exploitation by a few and non-accountability?

Purely topics is way different. Like abnormal streams of immigrants.

Fascism was always here by all laws and rules

Fascism is not a set of policies

I mean, ironic considering the current political climate, where one is considered far-right and the other far-left. Peak horseshoe theory.
yeah, they do feel outdated in a globalized world.

LA MISERIA HUMANA EN SU MAXIMA EXPRESION.........EL AUTOR DE ESTE POST...........UN CHILENO ODIOSO, FRUSTRADO, ENVIDIOSO, CON COMPLEJO DE INFERIORIDAD COMO MUCHOS, QUE NO ENCUENTRA OTRA MANERA DE EXTERIORIZAR Y DESFOGAR LAS MISERIAS PROPIAS DE UN DON NADIE POBRE DIABLO REDUCIDO A DESECHO. !!!!!!!!!!! DAS LASTIMA !!! Ya lo decia Isabel Allende, la escritora y novelista CHILENA

Allende: EL CHILENO QUIERE SER RACIALMENTE ARGENTINO Y CULTURALMENTE PERUANO. Con que argumento valido me puede rebatir el pobre y triste autor CHILENO de ESTE post. EL QUE DA RISA ERES TU Y TU POBRE VIDA ODIOSA. CHILE, como lo dijeron muchos famosos, Es UNA MIERDA RECHAZADA POR CADA RAZA DEL MUNDO, DESDE INDIGENA, BLANCA , ASIATICA, JUDIA ETC Y POR ESO NO HAY NADA EN CHILE DE VALOR NI DE IMPORTANCIA, LA UNICA EXPORTACION QUE CHILE LE DA AL MUNDO ES EL CHILENO: UN SER TORPE, HEDIONDO Y FEO. LA ECONOMIA CHILENA? UNOS LADRONES QUE VENDEN COBRE ROBADO!!! UN CHILE CONDENADO, POBRE Y ASQUEROSO, ENVIDIA DE NINGUN PAIS !!!

Autism, even for ideologies the only way forward is subjecting it to its most organic aspects. Progress and revolution its morbid, loses shape and integrity, and is eventually subsumed.
Things only ought to exist because they have sufficient reason to, and such a reason includea its resilence to exist. Altough marxism (and its liberal substract) appear to try and stick, they are entities that over a series of iterations are destined to die on their own principles. Materialism, turns out, is inorganic, it cannot react and evolve.
Throw enough bacteria at a dish with weak acids and eventually some of them shall resist.

espejito rebotin

I don't mind Marxism as a disciple of sociology. Reification and commodity fetishization are both extremely relevant tendencies to this day. It falls apart on the idea of 'social capital' I for the life of me cannot figure out how anyone is supposed to organize productive forces under the idea of social capital. I understand taxes are a social construct to create this idea of unified contribution and identity, an imagined society, but it's so unclear about administration that I can't help but see it as a scam.

I think material analysis is at very least a useful tool, it is however simply oblivious to other patterns, many of the concepts marxism uses in regard to value are just presumptuous to not call them strawmans