London has a statue of George Washington...

London has a statue of George Washington, at it's base it has a layer of American soil because George Washington vowed never step foot on British soil again.

Does your country having humiliating stuff like this

#humiliationritual

In fairness several of our states are named after your royalty.
It won't be fair until you rename an island to "Jefferson" or something.

Just bear it a little longer, every evil empire will fall

This.
Great Britain will collapse soon.

Those states were named before independence so it is just heritage, it's not pure cuck shit. Also we have fucking Gandhi Statue too. Utter fucking joke of a country. I'm going to petition the GW statue be taken down because he was slave own and Gandhi because he is a nonce.

There's an equestrian monument of King Charles IV of Spain in Mexico City. Not sure if it really counts, however, since he was the legitimate head of state of what is nowadays Mexico, so I guess it's the equivalent to having a statue of King Edward IV or King James I in England.

Why is it in London instead of his family's ancestral home of Washington, Tyne and Wear?

because londoners are attention whores

sneak in and replace the american soil with british

doing bit of a mischief hehe

They should move it to the Old Hall before some londoners or those just stop oil people deface it

at it's base it has a layer of American soil because George Washington vowed never step foot on British soil again.

That is so unbelievably embarrassing. It's a fucking statue guys, grow the fuck up.

If a Texan has a child outside of Texas, they'll import Texan soil to wherever so that the child is born on Texan soil wherever they are.

Don't you have a nelson Mandela one as well or something stupid like that?

I think the yankees paid for it and the british just said ok.
At least that's real people and not a statue.

Humiliation ritual

yeah but that isn't the same thing, George Washington and Gandhi were actively fighting against Britain and considered us their enemy so us giving them statues is just pure cuckold shit. At least we don't have a Napoleon Statue I guess.

Gandhi

Actively fighting

We're talking about real life, hunger strike-gandhi, not CiV games gandhi, right?

He wasn't physically fighting but he was politically fighting against us and considered us his enemy (rightfully btw) but we shouldn't be honouring people who fought against us.

I think that's too harsh a stance, just like Gandhi, Michael Collins didn't necessarily hate Britain but he wanted independence for his own country and peaceful relations with Britain. It's just a fact that Britain wasn't always in the right in disputes and conflicts.

IMG_7714.jpg - 640x886, 122.59K

I'm not suggesting we were in the right I know a lot of times we weren't but we simply shouldn't be honouring these people. Imagine if the USA put a statue of the Vietcong leader up in Washington DC because morally he was in the right, utter humiliation ritual.

fake, Cotton Hill didn't do that to prevent his son from being born inside the Yankee Stadium's ladies room

Its just a statue lmao

Irish

Britain was 100% on the right side.

The USA had/has statues of the confederates which is/was very cucked. I think they started taking them all down though.

Ireland also kept all the same post boxes with the royal ensigns on them and just painted them green. Apparently it's too expensive to replace them with Irish symbols.

The USA had/has statues of the confederates which is/was very cucked

Confederates were Americans and are part of our history.

but weren't they like traitors to your homeland?

They were literal traitors who fought to not be Americans so they could keep owning black people. In doing this they caused the death of hundreds of thousands of people. They should be viewed with nothing but distain by any American.

Non-Americans just won't ever understand.

With malice towards none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us finish the work we are in to bind up the nation's wounds

... The wounds caused by the confederates fighting a war to specifically make their own new country. I get it, post war it was best to pander to the southerners to not poke the found but it's been 150 years, we can all admit they were shits and the reason they committed treason was legit evil.

The real reason the Union went so soft on confederates after they won is that they feared separatist movements continuing guerrilla warfare against the American federal government, the American government feared that at any time Britain or Mexico could capitalise on America's weakened state and start wars of reconquest against it.

More prudently the South for the last hundred years has been the primary source of manpower for the US military, the recent demonizing of the Confederacy and by extension their ancestors is probably the single biggest cause of the recruitment crisis we're experiencing.

Based.
There should be a McDonald's nearby to hammer in the fact.

Here is the latest humiliation ritual

All empires are evil.

We still have monuments to the Russians. Should have torn it down after GDR fell but we didnt. Should have torn it down after Ziggers started shit but didnt.
We wont because some people would seethe because it would upset their carefully crafted world of black and white morals

did this nigga really think this was worth it

reallynigga.png - 980x153, 15.23K

You guys have some Cromwell statues

Honouring the righteous shouldn't be constrained by national borders.

Ship the Washington statue back to America and replace it with an Osama bin laden statue